1-4 of 4 Answers
The curvature is 1500R.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.Thank God it's on a 1000r. I can tell you from experience 1000r It's too much. My old ultra wide monitor was 1800. My new monitor which is this monitor right here is 1500r It's the perfect curve. It doesn't distort the image. And it doesn't have you look to the left and look to your right with your head which is annoying and if you're gaming with it you definitely don't want to have to be turning your head to see an enemy and turning your head to the right to see an enemy. You want to be able to just look straight forward and feel immersed but it's the same time not have to turn your head to see someone's on your left. 1500r is the perfect curvature and a lot of people on the Reddit ultra-wide Master race forums would agree with me. So if you're trying to get a $1,000 you can always get the Samsung G5 34-in. That's a 1000R monitor but it only has 144 HZ which is still good and if you're playing games at 1440p with everything turned up high unless you turn on DLSS or FSR which lower factual resolution anyways so I tend not to like to turn those on. I like to play without those off and see how I can get my FPS because then I'm truly getting native 1440p dLSS and FSR actually downgrade your resolution and then upscale it. That's why it looks a little worse than native 1440p without those settings on. So 1:44 Hertz is perfect. So if you want $1,000R go with the Samsung G5 34-in. Otherwise if you want high Hz I have a 4090 or something or 4080 I'm sure you can get 180 fps on some games. There's a lot of games that I know you can't. Alan Wake 2, cyberpunk 2077, escape from tarkov. But if you have no problem using those settings to increase your FPS even though using those settings you're no longer really playing at native 1440p then I would get this monitor because it has 40 more Hz. And if you're specific looking for a thousand are get the Samsung G5 34-in even though the HC is lower 144 so I already keep them seem to think the higher the Hzz the better player you'll be. But I know people that play on 60z on console that dominate people playing on 240 Hz computer. I can only see past a certain Hz after that what you notice more is the latency. And monitors never advertiser latency. They advertise their input response as one millisecond but they don't advertise their latency. Anything under 10 millisecond latency is good. A good monitor will get around 7 millisecond latency. But the test latency he really got to have expensive equipment. Otherwise until gamers get serious about what they're latency is monitor companies aren't advertise that right now all gamers care about is the hurts and the input response time. When they really should be caring about the latency and I'm not talking about your ping. For anyways how do I went on more than what your question was but lol thought I would just let you know some things
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.The "R" corresponds to the Radius. Smaller radii equates to an increased curvature and larger radii equates to less.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.There is some curve. Not to crazy but just right
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.