“how is this V better or worse than the III? the III is hundreds of bucks cheaper ( but I cd not find it when i needed it) I saw that the III got a top 3 rating in may 2018, tho 3 yrs old cam. I wonder why the V did not make it tto the list>?”
Answer This Question
1-4 of 4 Answers
There are a couple of differences that sold me on the Sony V over the iii. With the V you are able to shoot 4K video (although it does go thru battery life a lot quicker.). But I have been able to shoot some good video with it. It also has a 24fps to the iii 10fps so it shoots faster action shoots then the iii. The sensor on the V is also supposed to be better. I can personally tell you that it does capature better light in low light situations even without the flash. I am very happy of having spent the extra money to get this camera.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.Following are the pros of V: 1. Faster autofocus. 2. Better processor/sensor. 3. Slow motion is much better. 4. Phase detection autofocus. 5. 4k video. With V you would know that you got the best in the series and thats even after the VI came out!
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.The RX100 V is a big jump in quality (both in photo and video) over the RX100 III. See https://www.imaging-resource.com/cameras/sony/rx100-iii/vs/sony/rx100-v/ for a quick comparison. That being said, the takeaway is that if you don’t need 1000fps slow motion video or 4K video recordings, the RX100 III is good enough.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.I’m not sure why the V is not on the list you saw, but it has tons of improvements over the III If you look online you will see that the V gets high marks everywhere! Yes, there is a difference in price but there is a big difference in overall quality. Also, there are many comparison charts online to show you the technical differences. Just google it.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.